Loader
Latest News
HR3089: NDO Fairness Act
20340
wp-singular,page-template-default,page,page-id-20340,wp-theme-bridge,bridge-core-3.3.4.8,qode-optimizer-1.2.2,qode-page-transition-enabled,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,qode_grid_1400,side_menu_slide_from_right,qode-theme-ver-30.8.8.8,qode-theme-bridge,qode_header_in_grid,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-8.7.3,vc_responsive
 
HR3089
NDO Fairness Act

1
Roll Calls
343
Yea (latest vote)
0
Nay (latest vote)
House
2023-05-15 – 2023-05-15

About HR3089

NDO Fairness Act

Policy Area: Crime and Law Enforcement

Sponsor: Rep. Fitzgerald, Scott [R-WI-5] (R-WI)

Latest Action (2023-05-16): Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

Summary

NDO Fairness ActThis bill makes various changes to the procedures and requirements with respect to delayed notification orders.Current law authorizes the government to compel providers of electronic communication services or remote computing services (providers) to disclose certain records and information pertaining to subscribers and customers. Further, a provider may notify subscribers or customers of the government's request for records and information unless the government obtains a delayed notification order.With respect to delayed notification orders, the billraises the standard for courts to grant a delayed notification order,requires courts to issue delayed notification orders only after issuing a written determination based on specific facts, andrequires orders to be narrowly tailored.Finally, the bill requires the Department of Justice to report annually on data related to delayed notification orders, including the number of customers or subscribers targeted; the number of applications for orders; the number of orders granted, extended, or denied; and the number of orders targeting members of the media or conduct related to certain protected activities.

Subjects: Business records, Computers and information technology, Congressional oversight, Consumer affairs, Criminal investigation, prosecution, interrogation, Internet, web applications, social media, Judicial procedure and administration, Right of privacy

Who Voted How on HR3089

Filter by Yea, Nay, or Absent

Vote Breakdown — HR3089

How members voted on HR3089. 363 total positions across all roll calls for this bill.

Member Date Question Vote Result
Robert B. Aderholt (R-Alabama) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Yea Passed
Jake Auchincloss (D-Massachusetts) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Not Voting Passed
Mark E. Amodei (R-Nevada) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Yea Passed
Alma S. Adams (D-North Carolina) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Yea Passed
Pete Aguilar (D-California) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Yea Passed
Rick W. Allen (R-Georgia) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Yea Passed
Jodey C. Arrington (R-Texas) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Yea Passed
Mark Alford (R-Missouri) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Yea Passed
Sanford D. Bishop (D-Georgia) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Yea Passed
Cliff Bentz (R-Oregon) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Yea Passed
Stephanie I. Bice (R-Oklahoma) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Yea Passed
Lauren Boebert (R-Colorado) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Yea Passed
Gus M. Bilirakis (R-Florida) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Yea Passed
Vern Buchanan (R-Florida) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Yea Passed
Suzanne Bonamici (D-Oregon) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Yea Passed
Joyce Beatty (D-Ohio) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Yea Passed
Andy Barr (R-Kentucky) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Yea Passed
Julia Brownley (D-California) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Yea Passed
Ami Bera (D-California) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Yea Passed
Brian Babin (R-Texas) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Yea Passed
Donald S. Beyer (D-Virginia) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Yea Passed
Mike Bost (R-Illinois) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Yea Passed
Brendan F. Boyle (D-Pennsylvania) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Yea Passed
Don Bacon (R-Nebraska) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Yea Passed
Jim Banks (R-Indiana) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Yea Passed
Nanette Diaz Barragán (D-California) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Yea Passed
Jack Bergman (R-Michigan) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Yea Passed
Andy Biggs (R-Arizona) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Yea Passed
Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-Delaware) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Yea Passed
Troy Balderson (R-Ohio) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Yea Passed
James R. Baird (R-Indiana) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Yea Passed
Tim Burchett (R-Tennessee) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Yea Passed
Shontel M. Brown (D-Ohio) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Yea Passed
Aaron Bean (R-Florida) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Yea Passed
Nikki Budzinski (D-Illinois) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Yea Passed
Eric Burlison (R-Missouri) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Yea Passed
Josh Brecheen (R-Oklahoma) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Yea Passed
Becca Balint (D-Vermont) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Yea Passed
Ken Calvert (R-California) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Yea Passed
James E. Clyburn (D-South Carolina) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Yea Passed
Kat Cammack (R-Florida) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Not Voting Passed
John R. Carter (R-Texas) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Yea Passed
Tom Cole (R-Oklahoma) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Yea Passed
Ed Case (D-Hawaii) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Yea Passed
Jim Costa (D-California) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Not Voting Passed
Emanuel Cleaver (D-Missouri) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Yea Passed
Henry Cuellar (D-Texas) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Yea Passed
Kathy Castor (D-Florida) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Yea Passed
Yvette D. Clarke (D-New York) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Yea Passed
Steve Cohen (D-Tennessee) 2023-05-15 2/3 Yea-And-Nay Yea Passed

Showing 50 of 363 positions. JavaScript-enabled view supports filter by Yea/Nay/Absent and pagination.

Interactive features require JavaScript. Static data shown above.

Other Contested Bills

Interactive features require JavaScript. Static data shown above.

Frequently Asked

What is HR3089?

HR3089 is the NDO Fairness Act, introduced in the House of the 119th U.S. Congress by Rep. Fitzgerald, Scott [R-WI-5] (R-WI). NDO Fairness ActThis bill makes various changes to the procedures and requirements with respect to delayed notification orders.Current law authorizes the government to compel providers of electronic communication services or remote computing services (providers) to disclose certain records and information pertaining to subscribers and customers. Further, a provider may notify subscribers or customers of the government’s request for records and information unless the government obtains a delayed notification order.With respect to delayed notification orders, the billraises the standard for courts to grant a delayed notification order,requires courts to issue delayed notification orders only after issuing a written determination based on specific facts, andrequires orders to be narrowly tailored.Finally, the bill requires the Department of Justice to report annually on data related to delayed notification orders, including the number of customers or subscribers targeted; the number of applications for orders; the number of orders granted, extended, or denied; and the number of orders targeting members of the media or conduct related to certain protected activities.

Who sponsored HR3089?

HR3089 was sponsored by Rep. Fitzgerald, Scott [R-WI-5] (R-WI). Cosponsors and roll-call positions are listed on this page.

What is the current status of HR3089?

As of 2023-05-16, HR3089 Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary..

How did Congress vote on HR3089?

HR3089 has had 1 roll-call vote on record. The most recent: 2023-05-15 — 2/3 Yea-And-Nay (Passed).

What policy area does HR3089 cover?

HR3089 is categorized under "Crime and Law Enforcement." Browse other bills in this area at /topic-crime-and-law-enforcement/.

Where can I see all member positions on HR3089?

Each member’s vote is shown on this page, with party affiliation, state, and the official vote question. Click any member to see their full voting record.